Protect EMS
Protect EMS Home Amendment 745 facts Press Myths & Realities FAQs Contact

 

Your communities can't afford to have this bill die. Make sure there is a vote for H.3917 so that emergency medical services are preserved.

Act Now: Call Your State Legislators

Coalition to Protect Emergency Medical Services Backs Measure
H. 3917 To Secure Public Safety, Prevent Insurance Companies From Shifting Costs To Cities and Towns

Fire Chiefs, Municipal Officials Join to Thwart Insurance Industry

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Boston, MA) April 25, 2011 — The Coalition to Protect Emergency Medical Services today urged the House of Representatives to adopt a budget amendment that would prevent insurance companies from undermining public safety by slashing reimbursement rates for Emergency 911 services and shifting costs onto cities and towns.

At a State House press conference, representatives from fire departments joined legislators and municipal officials to call on the House to stop the insurance industry’s attempt to unilaterally cut reimbursement rates for Emergency 911 services, which would shift the costs onto taxpayers.

Citizens rely on E911 services that can get them or their loved ones to urgent medical care. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (BCBSMA) is trying to cut the reimbursement rate. When that happens, patients suffer from longer response times and cuts in service.

Marshfield Fire Chief Kevin Robinson

“We cannot stand by while insurance companies try to cut their own costs and undermine public safety,” said Marshfield Fire Chief Kevin Robinson, president of the Massachusetts Fire Chiefs Association. “We are trying to prevent a situation where people who call 911 for emergency medical care have to wait longer for that ambulance to arrive.”

Rep. James Cantwell (D-Marshfield) submitted an amendment to the budget that would prevent the cuts in reimbursement and give cities and towns authority to set ambulance reimbursement rates for E911 calls.

“What’s really going on here is that Blue Cross Blue Shield is trying to force emergency medical service providers to join its network. The problem is that their reimbursements to in-network providers don’t even cover the providers’ costs,” said Rep. Cantwell.

Rep. James Cantwell (D-Marshfield)

A similar measure passed the House and Senate last year but was vetoed by the Governor. Proponents altered the amendment by stripping out language that would have kept reimbursement rates to three times the rate for Medicare and Medicare rates. Under the proposal, towns would set E911 rates.

Melrose Mayor Robert J. Dolan and Melrose Fire Chief John O’Brien also spoke at the press conference. “We have an E911 system that works right now in Melrose. Cities cannot afford to shoulder new costs because the insurance industry wants to make more money,” said Mayor Dolan. Municipal budgets are severely strained, and the Legislature needs to act now to prevent a new financial burden for cities and towns.”

"Big insurance companies should not be deciding rates for E911 services, which differ greatly from town to town. Local officials know the special circumstances of their communities and are better positioned to make that call,” said Kevin Paico, Town Manager of Foxboro.

Contrary to the claims of Blue Cross Blue Shield, E911 services are not like other medical specialties, where reimbursement can be controlled by accountants in cubicles. There are essential differences, and the most appropriate rate setting authority is city and town officials.

###

CONTACT:
Jim McManus
Slowey/McManus Communications
Jim@sloweymcmanus.com
508-816-3061


 

Additional Press

6.14.12 - Wicked Local Norwell
Ambulance costs: Who pays whom?

6.6.12 - Lowell Sun
Forcing Mass. Ambulance Collection Leads to Fraud

5.8.12 - patriotledger.com
House approves ambulance pay bill backed by Marshfield fire chief

3.12.12 - State House News Service
Committees advance bill forcing direct pay for ambulance rides

2.24.12 - huffingtonpost.com
Door-to-Balloon Time Shorter With EMT Diagnosis: Heart Month

2.14.12 - online.wsj.com
The Ultimate Lifesaver

2.3.12 - telegram.com
Crisis in ambulance payments

1.25.12 - Protect EMS Legislative [video]

1.25.12 - Protect EMS Legislative Briefing on Ambulance Reimbursement [video]

10.1.11 - bostonherald.com
Chelmsford arrest reignites debate over ambulance pay policy

9.13.11 - Boston.com
A bill to choke on

8.23.11 - The Beacon
MMA supports bill to protect EMS Payments [pdf]

7.16.11 - The Boston Globe
Blue Cross spends to cure PR trouble, but to no avail

7.6.11 - boston.com
Blue Cross to refund ex-CEO's $4.26m payout

6.30.11 - Gloucester Times
Letter: Is Blue Cross crucifying Gloucester taxpayers?

6.29.11 - New Bedford Standard Times
Letter: Fairhaven EMS feeling effects of Blue Cross policy

6.24.11 - New Bedford Standard Times
Our View: Passage of EMS bills will keep towns safer

6.15.11 - www.gloucestertimes.com
Fire officials fight Blue Cross billing push

5.26.11 - www.lowellsun.com
Lawmakers oppose ambulance companies collecting payments

5.25.11 - American Heart Association on Senator Timilty's Amendment #27 [pdf]

5.22.11 - Cape Cod Times
Don't let insurers control emergency response costs

5.17.11 - boston.com
Rebound continues for health insurers
Gains due in part to patients delaying care because of cost

5.13.11 - nytimes.com
Health Insurers Making Record Profits as Many Postpone Care

5.12.11 - boston.com
Ambulance rates rise to cover costs

5.2.2011 - bostonherald.com
Buck passed to towns

4.26.2011 - boston.com
Insurers��� ambulance bill practice protested

4.26.2011 - enterprisenews.com
Rep. James Cantwell of Marshfield says Blue Cross 'bullying' cities, towns

4.25.2011
Coalition to Protect Emergency Medical Services Rallies in Support Representative Cantwell's Amendment #745